This article was published by Al Jazeera International.
Valletta, Malta - As Europe's leaders forged a new
common policy on rescuing refugees at sea, one small ship came to embody the
battle for the soul of the continent.
The MV Lifeline soared to notoriety this week after it refused to hand
over 233 refugees and migrants it rescued to Libyan authorities.
The vessel, operated by German charity Mission Lifeline, picked the
refugees up just outside Libya's 12-mile territorial waters on June 21. What
followed pitted governments against freelance search-and-rescuers.
"After a while, a Libyan coast guard boat approached us and told
us to hand [over] the migrants to them," Lifeline co-founder Axel Steier
told Al Jazeera.
"They wanted to bring back the migrants to Libya where they would
be put [in] jail. So we said … there is no way for us to hand [over] the
migrants," he said.
The Lifeline was operating under the coordination of the Italian
coastguard, which effectively seconded the Libyan coastguard's request.
"The Italians … provided us with case numbers, but actually they
handed over these cases to the Libyans and said to us, 'the Libyans take
responsibility for this rescue'," Steier said.
"We think that Italians are breaking international law, because
Libya is not safe and the people are crowded in such prisons, they face
malnutrition there, torture and rape for sure, so we are sure this is not a
solution and should stop very soon."
Changing European mood
The Lifeline spent six days at sea, unable to find a European port
that would accept its refugees, reflecting how attitudes in Europe have
hardened since the anti-migration government of Giuseppe Conte took power in
Italy.
Maltese Prime Minister Joseph Muscat said the Lifeline "went
against international rules and ignored directions given by Italian
authorities".
It was, however, allowed to dock in Malta on Friday.
France had earlier agreed to take in some of the refugees and migrants
aboard the ship, but French President Emmanuel Macron accused the rescue boat
of "playing into the hands of smugglers by reducing the risks of the
journey".
Veronique Fayet, head of the French NGO Secours Catholique, said the
leaders' words "are very violent for charities like ours who are very
active with migrants and who do not see any similarity between ourselves and
people smuggling".
The idea of offshoring migrant camps - and the humanitarian
responsibility that goes with rescue - now seems to be at the heart of Europe's
thinking.
Last year, Italy agreed to provide Libya with coast guard vessels, in
return for the Libyan authorities holding back refugees who try to cross to
Europe. Amnesty International estimates that Libya
prevented 20,000 from crossing last year, reducing flows by 78 percent. It's
not just that Italy has been keen to uphold its arrangement as a blueprint.
Countries like Austria, Hungary, Poland, the Czech Republic, Denmark and
Slovakia are inclined to support it.
Those same states have refused to participate in a redistribution of
asylum applicants crowding the EU's external border states, Greece, Italy,
France, Malta and Spain.
That redistribution was a central plank of the Central European Asylum
Policy, which now appears to be unravelling.
Growing support for resettlement outside the EU
The idea is catching on with the European Commission (EC). An EC draft
document leaked days before the summit said: "We will support and organise
more protection and reception capacity outside the EU as well as resettlement
(on a voluntary basis) while fully respecting legal guarantees in the field of
asylum."
The document also said political leverage would be used to persuade
countries that produce migrants, to keep them at home.
"We will broaden the negotiation framework with countries of
origin, using legal migration pathways (vocational training, studies, work) and
visa policy as leverage. We will apply adequate conditionality in our bilateral
relations with them."
A visit to Malta's reception centre for refugees suggests why Europe
has second thoughts about bringing refugees to Europe. Refugees from
sub-Saharan countries milled around the centre, set beside a ship breaker's
yard.
They have nothing to do but sit in a dilapidated cafe. The World Cup
played on a flat-screen TV, mixing with the sound of dominos being slapped
against wooden tables, as the beached hulls of merchantmen tower above
them.
Some sold cheap clothing and perfume. None wanted to talk or be
photographed. The air smelled of untreated sewage.
Even this tumbledown nonchalance is a victory of sorts. Steier
describes the terror felt by Lifeline's passengers at the prospect of returning
to Libya.
Many had crossed the desert from Sudan at great expense, discomfort
and danger.
"When the Libyan coastguard arrived, people feared a lot and one
man was coming to the captain and got down on his knees and praying, 'don't
hand us over, don't hand us over', and afterwards he took our captain in his
arms and said, 'thank you, thank you, thank you', and was crying."
Steier also thinks the Libyan coastguard is involved in smuggling
operations.
"In Libya you have to pay for a ride on these [refugee] boats, it
costs about 600 dollars. If you get caught by the coast guard maybe they bring
you back to an official disembarkation point, or you get sold to the smugglers,
and after you are owned by your smuggler you face torture.
"They send torture videos to the family to get another time 600
dollars and then they send out again. This is the money game with the people in
Libya, which also involves the Libyan coastguard."
A case has been filed against Italy at the European
Court of Human Rights for sending migrants and refugees back to camps where
torture and ill treatment may occur – a principle known as refoulment under the
Geneva Convention. Should the court uphold the plaintiff, Italy’s policy would
have to change. The Italian coast guard did not respond to requests for comment
on this story.
Steier says Lifeline is in possession of such a video from one of the
people it rescued, and will release it in the coming fortnight.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.