This article was published by Al Jazeera International.
![]() |
Tayyip Erdogan and Alexis Tsipras (R) pose for pictures before entering the Greek prime minister's office (Handout) |
Turkish
President Tayyip Erdogan's visit to Greece was supposed to be historic, because
it was the first by a Turkish president in 65 years.
If it is to be
remembered, it is likely that it will be for a public spat between Erdogan and
his Greek counterpart, Prokopis Pavlopoulos, over a 94-year-old treaty.
"I don't
think the meeting will stand up to history," says Haralambos Tsardanidis,
head of the Institute of International Economic Relations. "The meeting
between the presidents rather poisoned the relationship."
In an interview televised in Greece
the night before Erdogan's visit, he set the agenda. Erdogan expressed the wish
to "update" the 1923 Lausanne Treaty, which fixed the border between
Greece and Turkey and provided for protections of minority rights and customs
in both countries.
Greece is
against any revision of the treaty, and Pavlopoulos, a constitutional law
professor, told Erdogan on it as soon as they met, calling it
"non-negotiable".
"It has no gaps. It needs
neither revision nor updating. It stands as it is, it covers absolutely the
issues that it needs to cover, and stresses that among other things it leaves
no leeway for grey zones or minority issues," Pavlopoulos said.
Erdogan replied: "In
Western Thrace they can't even stand the word Turkish. They abhor seeing it on
a school sign or a club. We need to get past this. When I talk about updating,
this is exactly what I mean."
Erdogan said he
would like the Muslim community in Thrace to be called Turkish, to be free to
elect its head mufti [who is currently state-appointed] and to enjoy a higher
standard of living.
Greek
observers were surprised. "I must say, I've never seen a substantive
negotiation take place in front of the cameras," commented Yiorgos
Koumoutsakos, Greece's conservative shadow foreign minister.
Conservatives
on the street were happy, however. "I think Pavlopoulos has scaled the
pinnacle of his political career," said right-wing radio commentator
Yiorgos Trangas.
Nor did the
atmosphere greatly improve when Erdogan met Alexis Tsipras, the Greek prime
minister. During their discussions, they sparred over the ongoing division of
Cyprus, whose northern third has been occupied by Turkish troops since a 1974
invasion.
Erdogan blamed the Greek side for two
failed rounds of talks to reunify the island in 2004 and this year. "The
Greek Cypriot side wanted to walk out of talks and I said, 'No, we will sign an
agreement.' In the referendum that followed, 60 percent of the Turkish-Cypriots
accepted the Plan but 60 percent of Greek-Cypriots rejected it. The Greek
Cypriots promised us that we would solve the Cyprus problem but that's not what
happened. Recently we met again in Switzerland but who walked out? The
Greek-Cypriot side again."
Tsipras
responded: "I am 43 years old, and for 43 years Cyprus has been an ongoing
issue ... this issue remains open because 43 years ago there was an illegal
invasion and occupation of the northern section of Cyprus."
A leading
Turkish newspaper, Hurriyet, saw the acrimony as a deliberate deflection of
attention from US President Donald Trump’s controversial decision to recognise
Jerusalem as the Israeli capital. “Today is the first Friday after Trump’s decision and millions of
Muslims are expected to take to the streets across the world after Friday
prayers by midday,” wrote senior editor Murat Yetkin. “[Erdogan] chose to focus
on Lausanne, showing his mastery on how quick he could change the agenda.
Perhaps thanks to this manoeuvre he tried to maintain a degree of control over
the potential anti-U.S. protests that would erupt… and at the same time caught
the Greeks off guard.”
Bilkent
University's Ioannis Grigoriadis blames the Greek side for what he calls a
"derailment".
“I don’t think Erdogan intended to cause
problems during his visit, but since the Greek president put things to him in
public he felt obliged to respond,” says Grigoriadis, a political science
professor at Bilkent University.
Presenting Turkey as the protector of
Muslim minorities in the Balkans is a standard Turkish foreign policy position,
and Grigoriadis believes Erdogan would have mentioned the Muslim minority in
Greece anyway, but in a less acrimonious way.
"He wanted to appeal to his
right wing. That's his base, and he’s afraid of
losing part of it to the MHP-splinter ‘Good Party’ that has been recently
founded,” Grigoriadis says.
Erdogan was
elected to the presidency in 2014 with a sliver of a majority - 52 percent -
and he failed to carry Turkey's largest cities - Istanbul, Izmir and the
capital, Ankara, in an April 16 referendum granting the presidency increased
powers.
He faces re-election in 2019. “He has reason to worry about the elections despite
the state of emergency,” says Grigoriadis. “His polls are declining. The
economy is in a fragile mode. There are many parameters that could shift
against him.”
Falling international confidence in
the Turkish economy is reflected in the Turkish lira, which has dropped to 26
cents on the dollar, from almost 60 cents four years ago. Some of that
confidence gap stems from the increasing isolation of Turkey, since a July 2016
attempt by military officers to unseat Erdogan.
The Greeks sought this meeting partly
because it was an opportunity for Greece to act as a mediator between Europe
and Turkey.
Since then, Turkey’s state of
emergency has distanced Erdogan from European leaders even further. Greece’s
invitation to Erdogan is only the second from an EU country since the coup.
Greece is also alarmed by the rise in
refugees arriving across the water from Turkey, from an average of 50 a day in
the spring to four times that number. That rise has come with renewed tension
in the Aegean - some 3,000 airspace violations by Turkish fighter aircraft this
year, marking a five-year peak. In a statement last month, Foreign Minister
Nikos Kotzias said that “the danger of an accident in the Aegean is on the
rise,” as Greek fighter jets take off to meet Turkish ones. And Greece says
territorial water violations number 1,600 this year, a ten-year high.
In this area of security, the two
sides may have achieved something, believes Tsardanidis.
"What was salvaged was that the
two sides agreed to talk about confidence-building measures and [delineating]
the continental shelf. Both are important to the Greeks because they can lower
tensions in the Aegean," he says.
However, he cautions against
over-optimism. "It's open to question whether the climate that was created
will allow for progress, because there are people in Greece and Turkey who
don't want to see a substantial negotiation between Greece and Turkey, and they
are very uncompromising."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.